Editing LFI Course Materials/Cohort two final projects

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
==== Nicole Becwar: [https://github.com/alisonLFP/libraryfreedominstitute/blob/master/LFI2/finalprojects/Library%20Freedom-%20Vendor%20Scorecard-%20110719.pdf Vendor privacy scorecard]; [https://github.com/alisonLFP/libraryfreedominstitute/blob/master/LFI2/finalprojects/WhyPrivacyLicenseQ%26A-Qiana_Nicole.docx Vendor Privacy FAQ] CC BY-NC-SA ====
 
==== Nicole Becwar: [https://github.com/alisonLFP/libraryfreedominstitute/blob/master/LFI2/finalprojects/Library%20Freedom-%20Vendor%20Scorecard-%20110719.pdf Vendor privacy scorecard]; [https://github.com/alisonLFP/libraryfreedominstitute/blob/master/LFI2/finalprojects/WhyPrivacyLicenseQ%26A-Qiana_Nicole.docx Vendor Privacy FAQ] CC BY-NC-SA ====
In 2015, NISO brought together library staff, publishers, and software providers to create, “Consensus Principles on User’s Digital Privacy in Library, Publisher, and Software-Provider Systems” in an attempt to find common ground for library patron privacy. Based on the principles identified in the white paper, we analyzed 12 vendor privacy policies, including ProQuest, Elsevier, EBSCO, OCLC, Ex Libris, and JSTOR, vendors who were part of the core working group for the NISO white paper, to create the vendor privacy scorecard. The policies were graded against a common rubric and practices were denoted as being good privacy practices, areas of concern, or privacy practices that were incompatible with library privacy values.
+
 
 +
This scorecard rates twelve different popular library vendors, many of which had signed on to the NISO Consensus Principles on Users’ Digital Privacy in Library, Publisher, and Software-Provider Systems. The policies were graded against a common rubric and practices were denoted as being good privacy practices, areas of concern, or privacy practices that were incompatible with library privacy values.
  
 
==== Wren Kominos-Marvell: [https://github.com/wrenkominos/Stalkerware Stalkerware Training Resources]; [https://github.com/wrenkominos/PrivacyTools Privacy Tools Training]; CC BY-NC-SA ====
 
==== Wren Kominos-Marvell: [https://github.com/wrenkominos/Stalkerware Stalkerware Training Resources]; [https://github.com/wrenkominos/PrivacyTools Privacy Tools Training]; CC BY-NC-SA ====

Please note that all contributions to Library Freedom Wiki Page may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Library Freedom Wiki Page:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)