Editing Main Page/Crash Courses/Systems and Policies/Week four

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Week 4: Vendors ===
 
=== Week 4: Vendors ===
* Real time lecture: March 22nd, 8:30 Pacific, 11:30 Eastern on Zoom https://zoom.us/j/9129428892
+
* Real time lecture: June 10th 9:30 - 11:30 Pacific/12:30 - 2:30 Eastern on Zoom https://zoom.us/j/9129428892
* Recording: https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/691057142
+
* Slides: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ToZ8iUioQROo2GsCmn9QQWy5qwtQk6Ei/view?usp=sharing
 +
* Recording
  
 
==== Overview ====
 
==== Overview ====
 
There's really no other way to put this: we've got a vendor privacy crisis. Careless with patron data at best, collaborationist with the ICE deportation machine at worst, our vendors -- especially the biggest ones that we rely on the most -- are not representing our library values. The trend of big vendors increasing their portfolio of mergers and acquisitions means bigger, more powerful, even less accountable companies, collecting enormous datasets, adding more and more shady analytics products and tools, and effectively building highly sophisticated surveillance systems. There are increasing efforts at resistance to these vendors, but we need more leadership, bigger collective efforts, and more radical demands. This week, we'll talk about the vendor problems and our sites of resistance.  
 
There's really no other way to put this: we've got a vendor privacy crisis. Careless with patron data at best, collaborationist with the ICE deportation machine at worst, our vendors -- especially the biggest ones that we rely on the most -- are not representing our library values. The trend of big vendors increasing their portfolio of mergers and acquisitions means bigger, more powerful, even less accountable companies, collecting enormous datasets, adding more and more shady analytics products and tools, and effectively building highly sophisticated surveillance systems. There are increasing efforts at resistance to these vendors, but we need more leadership, bigger collective efforts, and more radical demands. This week, we'll talk about the vendor problems and our sites of resistance.  
 
Special quests: Qiana Johnson and Frans Albarillo, two LFP members who've worked extensively on vendor privacy issues.
 
  
 
==== Readings ====
 
==== Readings ====
Line 40: Line 39:
 
* Where do you have power? Where could you build power?  
 
* Where do you have power? Where could you build power?  
 
* What are the challenges to standing up to these vendor practices?
 
* What are the challenges to standing up to these vendor practices?
* Discussion link for this week: https://libraryfreedom.chat/t/cc-3-vendors/949
+
* Discussion link for this week: https://libraryfreedom.chat/t/cc-1-week-4-vendors/843
  
 
==== Tasks ====
 
==== Tasks ====
 
* Lecture, readings, discussion forum
 
* Lecture, readings, discussion forum
 
* If you're planning to do a final project, schedule a 1:1 checkin with Alison
 
* If you're planning to do a final project, schedule a 1:1 checkin with Alison

Please note that all contributions to Library Freedom Wiki Page may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Library Freedom Wiki Page:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)